Stephen Read: Liar Paradox | WSB #41

Download this episode / Watch on YouTube / RSS Feed / iTunes

Stephen Read

“This sentence is false”. Is that sentence true or false? If it’s true, then what it says must hold; but what it says is that it’s false, so it must be false. But if it’s false, then what it says must not hold; but what it says is that it’s false, so it must not be false. But if it’s not false, it must be true. So if the sentence is true, it is false, and if it is false, it is true. The sentence, therefore, seems to be both true and false, which seems absurd.

Philosopher and logician Stephen Read is one of the preeminent scholars on this “liar paradox”. He is known, in large part, for rediscovering and defending a long forgotten solution to the paradox first proposed by the medieval philosopher Thomas Bradwardine. In this first half of our conversation, Read covers the paradox’s rich and influential history. It was first discovered, in its full form, in the 4th century BCE by Eubulides (who also first set down the sorites paradox). It became a central problem in the 20th century via its association with Russell’s Paradox, a major problem in the foundations of mathematics. Later in the century, two thinkers – Alfred Tarski and Saul Kripke – proposed monumentally influential theories of language and truth motivated, largely, by the paradox. But even after their contributions, the consensus is that the paradox remains unsolved. Quite a few new solutions have been suggested in the decades since Kripke’s 1975 proposal. Among the more influential is Stephen Read’s revival of the Bradwardine solution, which will the subject of part 2 of this interview.

Next week: Stephen Read: Bradwardine’s Solution to the Liar

I’ve discussed the Liar briefly before, in both part 1 and part 2 of my interview with Graham Priest.

Audio

Video

Special thanks to Jackie Blum for the podcast art, and The Tin Box for the theme music.
Click here for the full list of episodes!

Topics discussed

0:19 – Intro to Stephen Read
4:24 – What is the Liar Paradox?
6:33 – The Greeks on the Liar
11:06 – Frege, Cantor’s Paradox, and Russell’s Paradox
18:24 – Tarski’s solution
21:55 – Natural language, formal languages, semantics, and the T-schema
32:03 – Shortcomings of Tarski’s solution
36:12 – Kripke’s solution

Sources

Stephen Read (homepage)
Liar Paradox” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Tarski’s Truth Definitions” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Outline of a Theory of Truth” (Saul Kripke)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *